posted Nov-07-2007 07:48 AM
quote: Originally posted by cookie74: This was my first marathon.I committed to a 20 week training plan months ago and spent 14 weeks building up to 20-30 miles per week before I started it. I followed the plan closely running five days a week and averaging about 35 miles per week with a peak of about 50. I was healthy throughout and never felt like I ever pushed myself to the brink of injury. Most of the miles were at an easy effort. That was a very positive experience..
You did great for a first marathon, and I don't mean to imply that you could have done better. The great part is you put it all together in a very sane way from start of training to race day moves, gels and all the rest of it. What you described is by far the most common "successful" plan and execution for someone who will run 3:25 to 4:25 marathons I've run 8 and I run regularly with lots of folks who have run more and what is left from all of our war stories after tossing out the silly and stupid plans and moves is a plan like yours. I'm also the nosiest SOB on the planet so I ask lots of questions of folks. Got to do something during train runs, races and while pounding down the brewskis after the runs. If you are younger and will have the time to train longer in both time and distance, then I"m not skilled in what you should be doing. But if you are close to being the average and dedicated journeyman runner who has some time to train but has anther life too, then you have found a good plan. You can hone it, but you can screw it up too. I say 3:25 to 4:25 because what happens is we often tend to change too many variable at once and sometimes life keeps us from getting out for our long runs. (for most people there is no substitution for long runs.) Anyone who says otherwise is not your friend. I'm an older dude but in my 4th marathon in 2002 my report read almost like your report from training to finish line and I finished in 3:40. The only difference was I had no cramping and at the finish I felt I could have run another 10K, which of course I couldn't because once the mind figures out it's over, IT is over. The other difference for me during the race was, it was my first Boston and I was bouncing on my feet at the start line like a kid on side line at a football game. You know the routine "Put me in coach, put me in!, put me in!!" I noticed your "uh-oh" comment at mile 6. remember that. In 2002 I found myself down at 7:45 and 7:55 pace a number of times in the first 10 miles and it felt like crawling when I backed off. In other marathons I tried to do that deliberately as a plan and it bit me in the A$$, as well it should, given my training levels. Trying to put time in the "bank" as they say, is the devils temptation. Good job and I'm excited for you because I remember how excited I was in my first marathon and then again at Boston in 2002. Darn, now I want to get out and train for a spring marathon when I'd decide I wasn't going to [This message has been edited by NHSenior (edited Nov-07-2007).]
IP: Logged |