| Author |
Topic: Low HR training/base-building ala Maffetone/Mark Allen |
r1girl Cool Runner |
posted Jun-16-2006 07:47 PM
Ok I ran this morning. I was scheduled to run a long run of 12 miles.Now I started this MAF about 3 weeks ago. Again a little background I have been struggling with runs and the hatred of my runs for about 2 years. Before that my marathons were anywhere from 8 to 10 minute miles. I was just about to drop running and crosstrain into something else when I discovered this thread. I said why not my last hope. I am simply amazed!!!!! Know I have not been keeping a great detail log on this but here is what I know. First week my heart rate was still going to 140 and up, it was so hard for me to slow down. Week two better control. Today I could see I am controlling heart rate 10 times better. Now,again when I first started MAF, I would say at 140 at the beginning I was running a 14 minute mile, which if I wasn't watching heart rate I would run a 10:00 minute mile. And Lord knows what my heart rate was while I was doing that!!!! The biggest thing of all was I started noticing that I am enjoying running again. I wake up now and look forward to running. I am more energetic!!!! Today's 12 mile run, I started out by saying "ok well do what you can". By the way I was hating running so much my miles were going backwards and for the last six months , except for the last 3 weeks my miles never went over 8 miles, and those were rare. Last week I did 10. So here I go start my run, my miles were anywhere from 13 minute miles to 13:30 minute miles. My heart rate for the first 6 miles was 123-127 even hills. Mile 6 to 9 127-134 Mile 10 about 135 and Mile 11-12 138-140. My MAF max is 134. I loved my whole 12 mile run and even at the end of the run I felt I could go on. I can't believe I have done a 360 on how I feel about running. I feel like my old self again!!!!! I am so happy!!!!! I am a little scared about the 13:30 minute mile but at this point loving running again and that's all that counts. And to be honest all during the run I felt I could just take off anytime. The whole 12 miles was effortless, a piece of cake, so I have that confidence that the speed will come. I am going to try to keep a more detailed log and get into this more. If you notice my heart rate did start to climb at the end. Also Monday, I bike 56 miles I tried to keep in MAF range, which I did do a very good job if I say so myself. The following morning for my run of 5 miles it seemed like my heart rate was up high again. Since I am paying more attention to my heart rate, I am starting to notice this more. I also notice if I have a relaxing day, the day before, the next day my heart rate is lower. Any thoughts let me know. Just wanted to share this happiness
IP: Logged |
A6RNNER Cool Runner |
posted Jun-17-2006 05:29 AM
hey jesse or anyone else. i guess i didnt have enough pressure on my first marathon in november so i went and signed up for my first oly tri in september. i have completed my first week (almost) of biking and swimming, in addition to keeping what i have been doing running. now jesse i know you and many others do all 3 disciplines and run marathons as well. do you have any "pearls of wisdom" as to someone to cant train twice per day, but only once, and time isnt an issue for that one training session. i am still maff running and in my mind will need to do the same with biking and swimming. any help? walter------------------ http://interwovendesign.com/kick/userdisplay.php3?username=A6RNNER
IP: Logged |
10smom62 Member |
posted Jun-18-2006 10:31 AM
Hey Jesse,This is another question that I am sure that has been asked and I would love to search for if there were only a search engine on the site!! When you run your races of any distance is your pace based on a time goal or HR? If HR what calculation do you choose for racing HR pace? Is it based off of Hadd methods of Max heart rate- 20 for marathon (and I think a little higher for shorter distances)? Thanks for your help.
IP: Logged |
10smom62 Member |
posted Jun-18-2006 10:46 AM
Qustion part two for jesse,I noticed in your training log that you seemed to make a significant improvement in pace in training runs below MAF AFTER you began doing mid-distance road races. Were you aware of that correlation? Do you think you would have improved as fast if you did not do a road race every so often? Have others using MAF training had similar experiences?
IP: Logged |
leitnerj Cool Runner |
posted Jun-18-2006 12:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by A6RNNER: hey jesse or anyone else. i guess i didnt have enough pressure on my first marathon in november so i went and signed up for my first oly tri in september. i have completed my first week (almost) of biking and swimming, in addition to keeping what i have been doing running. now jesse i know you and many others do all 3 disciplines and run marathons as well. do you have any "pearls of wisdom" as to someone to cant train twice per day, but only once, and time isnt an issue for that one training session. i am still maff running and in my mind will need to do the same with biking and swimming. any help? walter
Fortunately, for an olympic tri, you can get along without much volume. I would suggest you take a look at some of the schedules at trinewbies.com. If you're not able to keep up with their olympic schedule, then you'll have to make it more by "heart" than by training. In either case, I would recommend that you get in some bricks, bike immediately followed by run, because that's an important transition to get used to before the race. ------------------ MyRunningLog MyStuff
Low Heart Rate Training FAQ
IP: Logged |
leitnerj Cool Runner |
posted Jun-18-2006 12:54 PM
quote: Originally posted by 10smom62: Qustion part two for jesse,I noticed in your training log that you seemed to make a significant improvement in pace in training runs below MAF AFTER you began doing mid-distance road races. Were you aware of that correlation? Do you think you would have improved as fast if you did not do a road race every so often? Have others using MAF training had similar experiences?
Ok, for your previous question: if you dig through all the gory details of this thread, you'll see my long winded responses. My HR approach in a marathon is to find a comfortably challenging pace, take note of the heart rate and sustain that heart rate for a while, then eventually start to let it increase gradually. I don't recommend using any formula or suggestion for a specific racing heart rate. Most of my conditioning improvements occured during the many months of exclusive MAF training. You can see this if you plot my pace versus time for long runs . However, by running a lot of races, I have learned how to efficiently run races. For the most part, after races, my pace at low heart rates withers away a bit, especially after several races. There's a lot of data to sift through to put all of the pieces together. ------------------ MyRunningLog MyStuff
Low Heart Rate Training FAQ
IP: Logged |
leitnerj Cool Runner |
posted Jun-18-2006 12:57 PM
Just got back from Minnesota, where I ran Grandma's marathon. Posted the race report with splits/avg HR in the race reports section. While I've noticed my conditioning has withered a bit in the last month or so while the weather has gotten hot, I was surprised at how well I was able to do, especially in the warm and muggy conditions. And this time, I decided to kick it up a notch for the last couple of miles just to see if I could.
------------------ MyRunningLog MyStuff
Low Heart Rate Training FAQ
IP: Logged |
kcy1998 Cool Runner |
posted Jun-19-2006 07:32 PM
quote: Originally posted by leitnerj: Just got back from Minnesota, where I ran Grandma's marathon. Posted the race report with splits/avg HR in the race reports section. While I've noticed my conditioning has withered a bit in the last month or so while the weather has gotten hot, I was surprised at how well I was able to do, especially in the warm and muggy conditions. And this time, I decided to kick it up a notch for the last couple of miles just to see if I could.
Jesse, Your amazing! When I do Chicago this year my goal is to finish with a kick and meet my time. I start Daniels in a few weeks. Currently I am still Maffing. I am doing strides and everything. This is my question. My goal is a 8 mm at the marathon. Do you believe that I must be able to MAF at 8mm for me to achieve my goal? If my memory servers me right you ran Grandma's @ a 07:22 mm pace. Is this your MAF pace?
------------------ My Running Page
IP: Logged |
leitnerj Cool Runner |
posted Jun-19-2006 07:54 PM
quote: Originally posted by kcy1998: Jesse, Your amazing! When I do Chicago this year my goal is to finish with a kick and meet my time. I start Daniels in a few weeks. Currently I am still Maffing. I am doing strides and everything. This is my question. My goal is a 8 mm at the marathon. Do you believe that I must be able to MAF at 8mm for me to achieve my goal? If my memory servers me right you ran Grandma's @ a 07:22 mm pace. Is this your MAF pace?
absolutely not, to both questions! first of all, if you look at my running log, specifically at my outdoor runs, my pace at MAF for the last few weeks has been in the 9s and 10s. Very slow compared to where I was before my last few marathons. Then add the fact that the humidity was > 90% and that the temperature hit about 80. You can pull it from my race report or running log, but here were my splits/avg HR: 6:59/155, 6:56/164, 6:58/163, 7:12/164, 7:08/164, 7:14/165, 7:29/164, 7:32/164, 7:29/164, 7:07/163, 7:38/163, 7:31/162, 7:22/165, 7:29/166, 7:46/164, 7:39/166, 7:51/168, 7:48/169, 7:31/169, 7:46/171, 7:47/172, 8:06/169, 8:04/172, 7:48/175, 7:02/179, 7:06/185, 3:05/184(7:27/mi) Since it was so hot, I was more conservative than I would have been otherwise as far as HR goes (although, I kicked it up a notch later more than I would usually). My average HR was 168, lower than the 171 I had last marathon (in which I did 3:12 but in very nice cool conditions). So, in short, my MAF pace in the heat has been slower than 10 min/mile, but I averaged better than 7:30 per mile in the marathon. Now that surprises even me! I would have been very satisfied with a 3:40. Although this data set probably doesn't help you at all, hopefully it answers your question. ------------------ MyRunningLog MyStuff
Low Heart Rate Training FAQ
IP: Logged |
Noquickfix Cool Runner |
posted Jun-19-2006 10:04 PM
Leitner, I've been training at MAF+ 5 (146) since mid-January and I'm ready to move on. Wanted to ask you about long runs. Instead of running 18 - 22 milers at MAF, what do you think about building up to a high heart rate? For example, run the first 5 miles under a HR of 140, the next 5 under 150, next 5 under 160, the final miles in the 170's. I've definitely benefited from the MAF training style. Unfortunately, I never tested on a treadmill, so I'm not able to show accurate, controlled improvements. I will definitely utilize a treadmill next season when I start a second cycle at MAF. Any other recommendations for post MAF training? Thanks------------------ TrainingLog
IP: Logged |
leitnerj Cool Runner |
posted Jun-19-2006 10:13 PM
quote: Originally posted by Noquickfix: Leitner, I've been training at MAF+ 5 (146) since mid-January and I'm ready to move on. Wanted to ask you about long runs. Instead of running 18 - 22 milers at MAF, what do you think about building up to a high heart rate? For example, run the first 5 miles under a HR of 140, the next 5 under 150, next 5 under 160, the final miles in the 170's. I've definitely benefited from the MAF training style. Unfortunately, I never tested on a treadmill, so I'm not able to show accurate, controlled improvements. I will definitely utilize a treadmill next season when I start a second cycle at MAF. Any other recommendations for post MAF training? Thanks
In general, I think progression runs are a good form of training. You're probably asking the wrong person here, since I've done so well without anything more aggressive, but in general, everyone should try what feels right and see how it works. If I were to go that route, I wouldn't do such a progression run for every long run - I'd probably try it for about every third long run, perhaps every other one if keeping the first half entirely under MAF. Whether you do any treadmill runs is really not important. My first recommendation after the base is built is most typically a fast-finish long run, but I would generally say that the last 3-6 miles would be at MRP or faster, but not more than that. Nonetheless, I'm certainly not the source for the right answer, or even the best answer, but simply the "what Jesse would do" answer, worth the entire set of electrons you paid for it!
------------------ MyRunningLog MyStuff
Low Heart Rate Training FAQ
IP: Logged |
VikeKingDan Member |
posted Jun-20-2006 01:13 AM
Two things, quickly:First off, congratulations on Grandma's. And a belated welcome to Minnesota. Grandma's in a great venue. Last time Aharmer and I ran it, it was like 78° and we baked. I heard last weekend was horrific for humidity. I hope you enjoyed the scenery a little on the way  Secondly, just as a followup to my question a couple pages ago about the slowest pace you can comfortably run. I think I said I could only go as slow as 12:00 min/mi with walking thrown in to control my HR. I'm posting this for anyone else who reads the whole thread - you WILL learn to run slower. Just give yourself a couple weeks. I ran a blistering 13:34 today for my average mile, but at least I was running nearly the entire time. It takes a little time to train your body, so don't beat yourself up. Thanks, Dan
IP: Logged |
The Kevman Member |
posted Jun-20-2006 11:13 AM
Well Gang, 25 days into MAFF training and It seems that I have improved about 20 seconds per mile at MAFF -3. I started at 12:59 per mile and now down to 12:39 today. Keep in mind I just started running in March. Additionally I ran for 1 hour which I have never done before. Thanks for all the info posted here. My goal is to get my base up and start training in September for a HM. Thanks again for a great forum.Kev
IP: Logged |
The Kevman Member |
posted Jun-20-2006 11:14 AM
Well Gang, 25 days into MAFF training and It seems that I have improved about 20 seconds per mile at MAFF -3. I started at 12:59 per mile and now down to 12:39 today. Keep in mind I just started running in March. Additionally I ran for 1 hour which I have never done before. Thanks for all the info posted here. My goal is to get my base up and start training in September for a HM. Thanks again for a great forum.Kev
IP: Logged |
kcy1998 Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 11:27 AM
quote: Originally posted by VikeKingDan: Two things, quickly:First off, congratulations on Grandma's. And a belated welcome to Minnesota. Grandma's in a great venue. Last time Aharmer and I ran it, it was like 78° and we baked. I heard last weekend was horrific for humidity. I hope you enjoyed the scenery a little on the way  Secondly, just as a followup to my question a couple pages ago about the slowest pace you can comfortably run. I think I said I could only go as slow as 12:00 min/mi with walking thrown in to control my HR. I'm posting this for anyone else who reads the whole thread - you WILL learn to run slower. Just give yourself a couple weeks. I ran a blistering 13:34 today for my average mile, but at least I was running nearly the entire time. It takes a little time to train your body, so don't beat yourself up. Thanks, Dan
Dan, I am with you about the running slow but it does pay off. If you view the link you will see how I started out at a crawl and am currently running 09:40 at MAF. Note that I just started my 24th week. I have started to throw in some strides at the end of my MAF runs. My goal race is Chicago in October.------------------ My Running Page
IP: Logged |
kcy1998 Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 11:39 AM
quote: Originally posted by leitnerj: absolutely not, to both questions! first of all, if you look at my running log, specifically at my outdoor runs, my pace at MAF for the last few weeks has been in the 9s and 10s. Very slow compared to where I was before my last few marathons. Then add the fact that the humidity was > 90% and that the temperature hit about 80. You can pull it from my race report or running log, but here were my splits/avg HR:6:59/155, 6:56/164, 6:58/163, 7:12/164, 7:08/164, 7:14/165, 7:29/164, 7:32/164, 7:29/164, 7:07/163, 7:38/163, 7:31/162, 7:22/165, 7:29/166, 7:46/164, 7:39/166, 7:51/168, 7:48/169, 7:31/169, 7:46/171, 7:47/172, 8:06/169, 8:04/172, 7:48/175, 7:02/179, 7:06/185, 3:05/184(7:27/mi) Since it was so hot, I was more conservative than I would have been otherwise as far as HR goes (although, I kicked it up a notch later more than I would usually). My average HR was 168, lower than the 171 I had last marathon (in which I did 3:12 but in very nice cool conditions). So, in short, my MAF pace in the heat has been slower than 10 min/mile, but I averaged better than 7:30 per mile in the marathon. Now that surprises even me! I would have been very satisfied with a 3:40. Although this data set probably doesn't help you at all, hopefully it answers your question.
Jesse, Your input is greatly apprecriated. I am just trying to get an idea if my Marathon time is based upon my MAF times. Using you as my example I have to say "NO". This is based on the assumption that I have adhered to the proper marathon training program. If my MAF times need to be the same as my targeted MP then I was going to be depressed. At this time my MAF is 01:40 slower than my desired MP. The information you provided does not gurantee that I can turn my 09:40 MAF runs into a 08:00 MP but it does give me hope. Thanks, kcy ------------------ My Running Page
IP: Logged |
VikeKingDan Member |
posted Jun-20-2006 01:21 PM
kcy,That graph of your first four miles at MAF is exactly what I needed to see. I'm not far enough into it yet to get a real shape/trend from my own chart. Thanks!
IP: Logged |
StealthRunner Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 01:34 PM
quote: Originally posted by kcy1998:The information you provided does not gurantee that I can turn my 09:40 MAF runs into a 08:00 MP but it does give me hope. Thanks, kcy [/B]
kcy- More hope for you. If this lady can run the first 10k of a marathon like a 10k race ( ) and end up with an overall pace of 1mm faster than my MAF, I'm sure that you can do better with correct pacing!
IP: Logged |
kcy1998 Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 03:11 PM
quote: Originally posted by StealthRunner: kcy- More hope for you. If this lady can run the first 10k of a marathon like a 10k race ( ) and end up with an overall pace of 1mm faster than my MAF, I'm sure that you can do better with correct pacing!
StealthRunner, One thing that everyone tells me is my pacing is constant. If you have seen the video on my running page you can tell that I have hit the wall BIG TIME! Until Chicago I will continue to MAF with some speed work. I do not want my legs to forget how to run fast. Thanks for the encouraging words. kcy
------------------ My Running Page
IP: Logged |
kcy1998 Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 03:17 PM
quote: Originally posted by VikeKingDan: kcy,That graph of your first four miles at MAF is exactly what I needed to see. I'm not far enough into it yet to get a real shape/trend from my own chart. Thanks!
VikeKingDan, MAF is not a quick fix. I have had success when I look back and see where I came from. I do believe that the longer runs, 8+, have been very beneficial. Now my long runs are in the 12+ mile range. My real test will be at Chicago in October. Hang in there and do not give up. kcy ------------------ My Running Page
IP: Logged |
StealthRunner Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 04:00 PM
MAF work has worked for me. I still PRed that race on a harder course. Keep going. My long runs did include some MRP work at the end.
IP: Logged |
RUNSUB3 Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 04:27 PM
Hey guys, I was wondering if you can help me out. I'm a 20 year old male with limited running experience, meaning I ran off and on here and there. So my MAF should be 155. However, I remember reading something saying to add 5 bpm if you are 20 or younger. I am not sure as to what my MAF should be, 155 or 160. Today for example, I went out for 5.63 miles and I was hitting the 155-160 avg and felt fine. I don't know what I should stick at. Thank you.
IP: Logged |
leitnerj Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 06:11 PM
quote: Originally posted by RUNSUB3: Hey guys, I was wondering if you can help me out. I'm a 20 year old male with limited running experience, meaning I ran off and on here and there. So my MAF should be 155. However, I remember reading something saying to add 5 bpm if you are 20 or younger. I am not sure as to what my MAF should be, 155 or 160. Today for example, I went out for 5.63 miles and I was hitting the 155-160 avg and felt fine. I don't know what I should stick at. Thank you.
It's really hard to say - it seems that with younger runners (below about 25) something really individualized is required, so you may need some trial and error. If 155-160 avg felt about like what you were doing, try sticking with sub-150 for a while. Pretty arbitrary, I know. I'd be curious to know what your max heart rate is . ------------------ MyRunningLog MyStuff
Low Heart Rate Training FAQ
IP: Logged |
flynnmcmahon Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 08:54 PM
So heres a question. I have always been a slow runner. I mean slow, always. Since a teen I have been able to do longer distances but was horrible at sprints and such. So if I've always been slow how will slowing down help me? Ya know what I mean? I'd like to drop a few pounds and run my 2nd marathon in October. I have printed out the Beginners Marathon plan from this site and plan on trying to follow that. I am 36, will be 37 in August and running @ 5.0 on my treadmill with a 1% incline has my HR around 138-140 give or take. If I run outside, it always spikes up. Well if thats how I've run for, I don't know, maybe forever, how would this type of training help me out. I haven't been able to do any marathons in the past couple of years due to simple exhaustion and burn out. My first marathon I just ran and ran, tons of miles at my turtle pace. Didn't have a HR monitor back than though but if I had to estimate I def ran slow and would have to guess my HR was around 140-150. Thoughts?
IP: Logged |
leitnerj Cool Runner |
posted Jun-20-2006 09:16 PM
quote: Originally posted by flynnmcmahon: So heres a question. I have always been a slow runner. I mean slow, always. Since a teen I have been able to do longer distances but was horrible at sprints and such. So if I've always been slow how will slowing down help me? Ya know what I mean? I'd like to drop a few pounds and run my 2nd marathon in October. I have printed out the Beginners Marathon plan from this site and plan on trying to follow that. I am 36, will be 37 in August and running @ 5.0 on my treadmill with a 1% incline has my HR around 138-140 give or take. If I run outside, it always spikes up. Well if thats how I've run for, I don't know, maybe forever, how would this type of training help me out. I haven't been able to do any marathons in the past couple of years due to simple exhaustion and burn out. My first marathon I just ran and ran, tons of miles at my turtle pace. Didn't have a HR monitor back than though but if I had to estimate I def ran slow and would have to guess my HR was around 140-150. Thoughts?
First, we should be clear to distinguish "slow" from "lacking endurance." My recommended way to make the assessment as to whether "lacking endurance" applies to you is to look at item #1 in the FAQ and see if several of items a-h apply to you. If none of them apply to you, then you're endurance is probably fine, in which case, you're best bet is to incorporate speed work. Slowing down in itself does not make someone faster. That's obvious. Running a good amount of mileage well into one's aerobic zone can build endurance and "stretch out" the distance one can carry his/her short distance speed, over time. So, the first thing to do is to understand what you have to work on and figure out how to tackle it.
------------------ MyRunningLog MyStuff
Low Heart Rate Training FAQ
IP: Logged |
 |